Yu H, Xu JY, Zhang YR, Zhou XB, Zuo HR, Li Z. Prognostic factors of sepsis following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 122207 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.122207]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Dear Editor,
Thank you for your email informing us of the online publication of our manuscript titled “Prognostic Factors for Sepsis after Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair” (Manuscript ID: 122207). We greatly appreciate the efforts of the entire editorial team, reviewers, and production staff throughout the review and publication process.
We have accessed the electronic version via the F6Publishing system and noted your request for the mandatory author evaluation. We will log in to the system and complete the three surveys (credibility, peer review, and comments) within the required one‑week timeframe.
Once again, we are grateful for the constructive feedback provided during peer review, which has significantly improved our work. Please do not hesitate to let us know if any further action is required from our side.
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Li Zhi (on behalf of all co‑authors)
Date: August 17, 2026